WHAT IS CUSTOMS VALUE? BASIS FOR VALUING IMPORTED GOODS
Importers often use the commercial invoice or a CIF figure as customs value without reviewing freight, insurance, packing, royalties, assists, commissions and related-party pricing. An incorrect value affects not only import duty but also other import taxes, landed cost and post-clearance compliance. This article explains the legal basis, transaction-value conditions, the six sequential methods and the evidence needed before declaration.
QUICK FACTS
The commercial invoice is only the starting point. Conditions, additions, deductions and evidence must be tested.
The primary basis is the price actually paid or payable for the imported goods, adjusted as required.
The importer cannot select the lowest result. A later method is used only when the earlier one cannot determine the value.
Freight, insurance and related costs must be allocated to the correct transport segment without omission or double counting.
Contracts, payments, freight, insurance, royalties, assists and related-party files must form a traceable record.
SCOPE
This article addresses imported goods sold for export to Vietnam and is designed for pre-declaration review, customs value queries and post-clearance self-audits.
KEY TERMS
| Term | Meaning | Operational role |
|---|---|---|
| Customs Value | Value determined for customs control, taxation and statistics. | Tax base for import duty and potentially other import taxes. |
| Transaction Value | Price actually paid or payable for the imported goods after required adjustments. | Primary valuation method. |
| Price Actually Paid or Payable | All direct or indirect payments to, or for the benefit of, the seller. | Extends beyond the invoice face value. |
| Additions | Buyer-borne, import-related and quantifiable items not already included in the price. | Bring the value to the legal import boundary. |
| Deductions | Separately identified items already included in the price but legally excludable. | Prevent post-import costs or domestic taxes from being overvalued. |
| Assist | Goods, tools, moulds, designs or services supplied free or at reduced cost for production. | May require objective allocation and addition. |
| Related Parties | Buyer and seller connected under statutory relationship tests. | Does not automatically reject transaction value, but price influence must be addressed. |
| First Import Checkpoint | The legal boundary for import-related transport costs. | Must be established from the route and records, not assumed from Incoterms alone. |
LEGAL BASIS OF IMPORT CUSTOMS VALUE
For imported goods, the legal basis is the actual price payable up to the first import checkpoint. Customs value is therefore not automatically FOB, CIF or the invoice total. The importer must establish whether transaction value is acceptable, what is already included, what is paid outside the invoice and what post-import costs can be separately excluded.
| Starting data | Required question | Risk if misread |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial Invoice | Does the price include freight, insurance, packing, royalties or assists? | Omitted or duplicated adjustments. |
| Incoterms | What cost scope is intended, and do the actual records match it? | Treating CIF or FOB as a complete valuation answer. |
| Contract and payment | Are there indirect payments, offsets, rebates, credit notes or third-party payments? | Understating the price actually paid or payable. |
| Logistics records | Which freight and insurance segment reaches the first import checkpoint? | Incorrect allocation of pre- and post-import costs. |
| Buyer–seller relationship | Are the parties related and did the relationship influence price? | Transaction value challenge. |
| Royalty/technical agreement | Is the fee related to the goods and a condition of sale? | Failure to add a qualifying royalty. |
WHEN TRANSACTION VALUE MAY BE USED
Transaction value requires reliable evidence and satisfaction of the legal conditions. Customs may request supporting documents when records conflict, the price presents a risk signal or a related-party relationship may have influenced pricing.
| Test | Compliant indicator | Indicator requiring explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Use/disposal restrictions | No unusual restriction materially affecting value. | Contractual restriction distorts the price. |
| Conditions of sale | No condition whose value cannot be determined. | Price depends on bundled obligations or cross-subsidies that cannot be quantified. |
| Subsequent proceeds | No resale proceeds revert to the seller, or they are adjustable. | Seller receives an undeclared share of later revenue/profit. |
| Related parties | No relationship, or evidence that the relationship did not affect price. | Unusually low intercompany price without comparable support. |
| Objective documents | Contract, invoice, payment, freight and technical records agree. | Missing, altered or untraceable records. |
THE SIX CUSTOMS VALUATION METHODS
| Order | Method | Primary data | When used |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Transaction value of the imported goods | Actual price paid/payable plus lawful adjustments. | First method if all conditions are met. |
| 2 | Transaction value of identical goods | Accepted value of identical imports at or about the same time. | Method 1 cannot determine value. |
| 3 | Transaction value of similar goods | Accepted value of comparable goods with similar materials and functions. | No suitable identical-goods data. |
| 4 | Deductive value | Vietnam sale price less allowable profit, general expenses, inland transport and taxes. | Reliable domestic sales data exist. |
| 5 | Computed value | Materials, production, profit, general expenses and delivery-to-import-boundary costs. | Reliable producer records are available. |
| 6 | Fall-back method | Reasonable, sequential and flexible use of earlier methods based on data available in Vietnam. | Methods 1–5 cannot determine value; arbitrary or minimum values are prohibited. |
The deductive and computed methods may be considered in reverse order upon a written request and subject to the applicable rules. Earlier methods cannot be skipped merely because a later method produces a lower value.
COMMON ADDITIONS
| Category | Examples | Core condition | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selling commission and brokerage | Buyer-paid sales commission or brokerage; excluding a genuine buying commission. | Not in price, related to imported goods and quantifiable. | Agency contract, service invoice, payment. |
| Containers and packing | Cartons, pallets, retail packaging and packing labour. | Buyer-borne and not included in goods price. | Packing contract, invoice and specification. |
| Assists | Materials, tools, moulds, designs or engineering supplied free/at reduced cost. | Used to produce the imports and objectively allocable. | BOM, mould contract, issue record, allocation model. |
| Royalties and licence fees | Trademark, patent, software or other qualifying fees. | Related to the imported goods and a condition of sale under the rules. | Licence agreement, sales contract, payment formula. |
| Subsequent proceeds | Share of resale revenue or profit accruing to seller. | Directly or indirectly payable to the seller and quantifiable. | Distribution agreement and settlement report. |
| Freight, handling and insurance to first import checkpoint | International carriage, relevant handling and insurance. | Buyer-borne, not included and objectively evidenced. | B/L or AWB, freight invoice, insurance debit note. |
DEDUCTIONS AND ITEMS NOT ADDED
| Item | General treatment | Evidence condition | Common error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freight/insurance after first import checkpoint | May be separated when already included and separately quantifiable. | Segmented scope and price evidence. | Deducting all inland costs without route analysis. |
| Post-import construction, installation, maintenance or technical assistance | Excluded if post-import and separately identified. | Separate contract, invoice and timing. | Bundled equipment/installation price with no allocation basis. |
| Vietnam taxes and charges included in the price | Excluded only where legally deductible and separately shown. | Contract/invoice identifies the tax and amount. | Deducting a tax not proven to be included. |
| Buying commission | Not added if it is a genuine buyer-representation fee. | Buying agency agreement and independent fee. | Label says buying commission but agent effectively represents seller. |
| Post-import distribution or marketing cost | Normally outside customs value if not a condition of sale or part of price payable. | Separate post-import activity and records. | Deducting a cost that was never included in the price. |
| Discounts | Considered only under the legal conditions and reliable records. | Transparent contract, timing, policy and payment evidence. | Reducing value based solely on a later credit note. |
INTEGRATED TRANSACTION-VALUE EXAMPLE
Technical example: machinery is invoiced FOB at USD 20,000. The buyer pays USD 1,200 international freight, USD 80 insurance and USD 200 packing not included in the invoice. A USD 300 buying commission is documented as genuine; USD 250 domestic carriage after the first import checkpoint is separately identified.
| Component | Amount | Treatment | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| FOB invoice value | USD 20,000 | Starting amount. | Purchase price. |
| Freight to first import checkpoint | USD 1,200 | Add. | Buyer pays and FOB price excludes it. |
| Insurance to first import checkpoint | USD 80 | Add. | Not included. |
| Packing | USD 200 | Add. | Related and buyer-borne. |
| Buying commission | USD 300 | Do not add if fully supported. | Not a selling commission. |
| Domestic carriage after first import checkpoint | USD 250 | Do not add, or separate if included. | Post-boundary cost. |
| Illustrative customs value | USD 21,480 | 20,000 + 1,200 + 80 + 200. | Before considering royalties, assists, relationships or other conditions. |
DOCUMENTS AND DATA TO CHECK
| Document/data | Issuer/preparer | Purpose | Key reconciliation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales contract/PO | Buyer and seller | Price, terms, rebates and royalty obligations. | Goods, model, quantity, Incoterms and pricing conditions. |
| Commercial Invoice | Seller | Commercial price and components. | Unit price, total, currency, discount and beneficiary. |
| Payment records | Bank/buyer | Direct, indirect, offset and advance payments. | Amount, beneficiary, invoice reference and deductions. |
| Packing List/BOM/catalogue | Manufacturer/seller | Goods identity, quantity and assist allocation. | Model, materials, weights and package. |
| B/L, AWB and freight invoice | Carrier/forwarder | Route, freight, handling and cost boundary. | POL/POD, prepaid/collect, currency and scope. |
| Insurance certificate/debit note | Insurer/broker | Premium and voyage coverage. | Insured value, route, premium and period. |
| Royalty/licence agreement | Rights holder/contracting parties | Relationship and condition-of-sale test. | Covered goods, sale condition and calculation formula. |
| Assist records | Buyer/manufacturer | Value of moulds, designs and supplied materials. | Original value, depreciation and allocation units. |
| Related-party file | Group/importer | Relationship and price-influence analysis. | Pricing policy, comparables and test values. |
| Customs valuation declaration/worksheet | Declarant | Method, adjustments and exchange rate. | Consistency with goods declaration and source documents. |
VALUATION CONTROL PROCESS
- Identify the transaction: sale, donation, lease, processing or internal transfer.
- Lock the goods and route: model, quantity, Incoterms, transport mode and first import checkpoint.
- Reconstruct the price payable: contract, invoice, payments and indirect consideration.
- Test transaction-value conditions: restrictions, sale conditions, subsequent proceeds and relationships.
- Build an included/excluded matrix: freight, insurance, packing, royalty, assist, commission and post-import services.
- Quantify adjustments: use objective data and a documented allocation basis.
- Select the method: use method 1 first; document why each earlier method is unavailable before moving on.
- Reconcile taxes: HS code, duty rate, exchange rate and related import taxes.
- Retain the audit trail: calculations, records, explanations, approvals and customs feedback.
RISKS AND COMMON ERRORS
| Error | Cause | Impact | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Using invoice value without adjustment review | No included/excluded analysis. | Under- or overvaluation and tax variance. | Mandatory valuation worksheet. |
| Double-counting freight/insurance under CIF/CIP | Scope not reconciled. | Overstated value and taxes. | Match Incoterms to invoices and debit notes. |
| Missing royalty or assist | Procurement, engineering and customs data are siloed. | Reassessment, late-payment interest and post-clearance risk. | Mandatory supplier onboarding questions. |
| Deducting post-import costs without evidence | All-in price cannot be broken down. | Deduction may be rejected. | Require separated contracts/invoices before import. |
| Assuming related parties cannot use transaction value | Misreading the relationship test. | Unnecessary switch of method. | Prepare evidence that the relationship did not affect price. |
| Selecting the lowest method | Ignoring sequential rules. | Value rejection, reassessment and penalties. | Document why each prior method fails. |
| Treating reference prices as minimum customs values | Confusing risk data with valuation method. | Inconsistent with legal/WTO principles. | Reference data may trigger review; the legal methods determine value. |
| Ignoring later debit/credit notes | Post-clearance process disconnected from procurement. | Tax and accounting mismatch. | Trigger a supplementary-declaration review when price changes. |
LEGAL SOURCES
| Instrument/source | Authority – status | Use in this article |
|---|---|---|
| Customs Law No. 54/2014/QH13, Article 86 | National Assembly; effective 1 Jan 2015, read with current amendments. | Principle that import customs value is the actual price payable up to the first import checkpoint. |
| Law No. 90/2025/QH15 | National Assembly; effective 1 Jul 2025. | Current amendment context for the customs legal framework. |
| Circular No. 39/2015/TT-BTC | Ministry of Finance; effective 1 Apr 2015. | Six methods, transaction-value conditions, adjustments and valuation records. |
| Circular No. 60/2019/TT-BTC | Ministry of Finance; effective 15 Oct 2019. | Amends the transaction-value rules, adjustments and alternative methods. |
| Circular No. 06/2024/TT-BTC | Ministry of Finance; effective 15 Mar 2024. | Repeals Article 24 of Circular 39 and Clause 13 Article 1 of Circular 60; it does not replace the six valuation methods. |
| Decree No. 167/2025/ND-CP | Government; effective 15 Aug 2025. | Updates customs procedures, inspection and value determination under Decree 08. |
| WTO Customs Valuation Agreement | WTO framework. | Establishes transaction value as the primary basis and the sequential six-method structure. |
Sources reviewed on 17 July 2026. Circular 39/2015/TT-BTC must be read together with Circular 60/2019/TT-BTC and subsequent amendment or repeal instruments. English translations in this article are for operational reference only and are not official legal translations.
FAQ
1. Is customs value always equal to CIF value?
No. CIF may be close to a destination-port cost scope, but included items, the first import checkpoint, royalties, assists, commissions and post-import costs must still be tested.
2. Is a low commercial invoice automatically rejected?
No. A low price can trigger review, but acceptance depends on transaction-value conditions and supporting evidence.
3. Can related parties use transaction value?
Yes, where the relationship did not influence the price or the applicable price tests are satisfied.
4. Is domestic transport in Vietnam included?
The segment to the first import checkpoint must be distinguished from the post-checkpoint segment. Exclusion requires separate, quantifiable evidence.
5. Is a royalty paid after importation added?
Payment timing alone is not decisive. The fee must be tested for relation to the goods and condition-of-sale requirements.
6. May the importer choose another method when records are incomplete?
The six methods must be applied sequentially, with documented reasons why the earlier method cannot determine value.
7. Is a customs reference price a minimum taxable value?
It should not be treated that way. Reference data support risk review; the final value must follow the statutory valuation methods.
Tiếng Việt
中文 (中国)
NEED TO REVIEW IMPORT PROCEDURES OR A SHIPPING PLAN?
Send us the product name, shipping route, current dossier, or implementation request in advance so we can suggest a suitable approach that is practical, focused, and aligned with your shipment.
Form E, Form D, Form AK, Form VK and EUR.1: Key Differences
Principles for Determining HS Codes for Import and Export Goods
What Documents Should a Shipment Pre-alert Include?
Why Can’t Import Duty Be Determined from a Trade Name Alone?
Third-Party Invoicing on Proof of Origin: Conditions and Records to Review
Common Errors That Cause Import–Export Documents to Mismatch
How do MFN tariffs and special preferential import tariffs differ?
When a Certificate of Origin May Be Rejected During Import Customs Clearance
What Is an AEO Priority Enterprise? Conditions and Customs-Clearance Benefits
What Information Should a Packing List Contain?
What Is a Commercial Invoice? Mandatory Information and Common Errors
HBL vs MBL: Key Differences and How to Reconcile Bills of Lading
Sea Waybill vs Surrendered Bill vs Original Bill: What Is the Difference?
Advance Determination of HS Code, Customs Value and Origin: Procedure and Legal Use
How to Handle Cargo Surplus, Shortage or Mismatch with Customs Documents