WHAT IS A CUSTOMS VALUATION CONSULTATION? WHICH DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE PREPARED?
A declared value below Customs reference data does not automatically authorize Customs to impose another price. Conversely, an importer cannot prove the transaction value merely by presenting a sales contract and invoice. Where Customs has doubts about the truthfulness, accuracy or eligibility of the transaction-value method, it may require an explanation and conduct a customs valuation consultation. This is a professional dialogue in which the declarant explains the pricing structure, sale conditions, payments and relevant adjustments. The declared value may be accepted, or rejected and re-determined under the statutory sequence of valuation methods. The file should therefore be built around the commercial logic of the transaction rather than assembled as disconnected documents at the last minute.
QUICK FACTS
It is an evidentiary step used to resolve doubts before Customs accepts or rejects the declared value.
Point g, Clause 4 of Article 25 lists eight groups of consultation and valuation records. The actual documents within each group still depend on the stated doubt and transaction structure.
Contract, invoice, payment, negotiation and accounting records must reconcile from the agreed price to the amount actually paid or payable.
Risk data supports comparison; the final conclusion must follow the applicable method, conditions and evidence.
SCOPE OF APPLICATION
This article mainly covers imported goods declared under the transaction-value method where Customs raises doubts about the declared value. It is relevant to trading imports, production materials, machinery, components and consumer goods, including transactions between related or unrelated parties.
For goods without a sale, leased or loaned goods, gifts, processing arrangements, re-imports, software rights, used goods or other special structures, the valuation method and supporting file must be adapted to the actual transaction.
KEY TERMS
| Term | Meaning | Operational role |
|---|---|---|
| Customs valuation consultation | A process in which the declarant explains and substantiates the declared customs value before Customs. | Resolves doubts before the declared value is accepted or rejected. |
| Transaction value | The price actually paid or payable for imported goods, subject to statutory conditions and adjustments. | The primary method when all conditions are satisfied. |
| Price actually paid or payable | The total payment made or to be made for the imported goods. | May include direct or indirect payments beyond the invoice amount. |
| Adjustment | An addition or deduction required under customs valuation rules. | Captures costs or benefits not fully reflected in the invoice price. |
| Valuation doubt/risk | An inconsistency or risk indicator identified from documents, databases or transaction conditions. | May trigger explanation or consultation. |
| Related parties | Buyer and seller connected under the statutory relationship criteria. | The relationship does not automatically invalidate transaction value; its price impact must be assessed. |
NATURE AND MECHANISM
For imported goods, customs value is determined from the actual price payable up to the first import border and through the statutory hierarchy of valuation methods. Customs reviews the declaration, valuation declaration, commercial file, risk-management data, comparable imports and any factor that may affect price.
1. Common valuation doubts
- A significant gap from comparable identical or similar goods.
- Inconsistencies among the contract, invoice, valuation declaration, freight, insurance and payment records.
- A large discount without a pre-existing policy or agreement.
- Unexplained royalties, licence fees, commissions, assists, tooling, free materials or indirect payments.
- Related-party transactions without evidence that the relationship did not influence price.
- Generic descriptions that prevent meaningful comparison of model, grade, condition or specifications.
Under current Clause 4 of Article 25, the head of the Regional Customs Sub-department is responsible for organizing the consultation and determining the appropriate form. Consultation may be direct or indirect. Direct consultation is an in-person working session, with documents and information exchanged through the online public-service system where necessary. Indirect consultation is conducted through the customs electronic data-processing system; where that system does not yet support the function, the online public-service system is used. Declarants rated at high compliance or above may select the form; other declarants undergo direct consultation.
3. Formal conclusions and follow-up
- The declarant agrees with Customs’ proposed value and method: Customs issues a Customs Value Notice and the declarant makes a supplementary declaration within the prescribed period.
- Customs has sufficient grounds to reject the declared value: the notice must state the rejection basis, value and method determined after consultation, and requires a supplementary declaration.
- Customs lacks sufficient grounds to reject: Customs issues the notice and clears the goods based on the declared value.
DOUBT–EVIDENCE MATRIX
| Risk indicator | Question to resolve | Priority evidence | Control point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price below comparable data | Is the difference caused by specifications, trade level, quantity, timing or delivery terms? | Catalogues, technical comparison, sales contract, purchase history and pricing policy. | Do not compare goods only by commercial name or HS code. |
| Large discount | Was it agreed before importation and actually applied? | Discount policy, emails, contract annex, credit note and receivable reconciliation. | Separate genuine commercial discounts from unsupported post-import adjustments. |
| Related parties | Did the relationship influence the price? | Ownership chart, independent-customer data, pricing policy and relevant transfer-pricing material. | A group-company confirmation alone is rarely sufficient. |
| Royalty/licence fee | Does the payment relate to the imported goods and constitute a condition of sale? | Licence agreement, calculation formula, invoices, payment trail and IP ownership. | Identify the payee and the time the amount becomes determinable. |
| Assists | Did the buyer provide tooling, designs or materials free or at reduced cost? | Tooling contract, handover record, export record and allocation schedule. | Use a supportable allocation and avoid omission or double counting. |
| Payment differs from invoice | Are there set-offs, third-party payments, service fees or payments on behalf? | SWIFT, bank statements, netting agreements, three-party contracts and accounting entries. | Reconcile deposits, bank fees, exchange differences and beneficiary details. |
DOCUMENTS AND DATA TO PREPARE
Point g, Clause 4 of Article 25 provides eight groups of consultation and valuation records. This is a legal framework, not eight fixed documents: many items are conditional, while the submission must address the stated doubt, valuation method and actual transaction.
| Statutory group | Documents to prepare | Purpose | Data that must reconcile |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Method-specific valuation file | Declaration, valuation declaration, contract, commercial invoice and records required under Circular 39/2015, as amended by Circular 60/2019. | Eligibility of the method and declared value. | Buyer/seller, goods, quantity, unit price, currency and sale terms. |
| 2. Commercial records and correspondence | Quotations, pro forma invoices, POs, emails/chats, addenda, price policies and records on delivery, transport, insurance, production, packing and other sale conditions. | How the price and transaction conditions were formed. | Timing, approver, discount, quantity and payment conditions. |
| 3. Insurance records | Policy/certificate, invoice or equivalent document and payment evidence, where applicable. | Insurance cost and related adjustments. | Shipment, route, amount, policyholder and beneficiary. |
| 4. Domestic and international transport records | Bill of lading, transport contract, freight invoice, equivalent records and payment evidence, where applicable. | Costs to the first import border and freight scope. | Route, leg, mode, payer, Incoterms and amount. |
| 5. Partner-country clearance file | Customs-clearance records from the exporting country or partner importing country, consularly legalized where available. | Cross-checking declarations and value at the relevant side of the transaction. | Parties, goods, quantity, unit price, document numbers and dates. |
| 6. Payment records | SWIFT, payment orders, bank statements, L/C, collection, bank or credit-institution records, deposits and set-off evidence, where applicable. | Actual price paid or payable and recipient. | Beneficiary, invoice, contract, amount, currency and payments on behalf. |
| 7. Accounting records | Books; foreign accounts payable/receivable entries; sales invoices; revenue ledgers; cash and bank-movement files; other accounting records. | An audit trail from import and payment to accounting and revenue. | Declaration, invoice, payable, posting date, inventory cost and off-invoice amounts. |
| 8. Other valuation evidence | Catalogues, datasheets, images, model comparisons, royalty/licence files, tooling/assist records, related-party evidence, reconciliations and other relevant records. | Resolving the stated doubt not fully addressed above. | Each conclusion must trace to a clause, page, payment or accounting entry. |
PROCESS AND TIMELINE
- Value review: Customs examines the declaration, valuation declaration, supporting records and risk data.
- Authority and form: the head of the Regional Customs Sub-department organizes direct or indirect consultation according to the compliance level and system conditions.
- Doubt notice/explanation request: the importer receives the specific issues to substantiate through the applicable electronic channel.
- Define the issue: determine whether the doubt concerns invoice price, related parties, adjustments, comparability or method eligibility.
- Submit and explain: the declarant, legal representative or authorized person provides the Point-g records. Direct consultation ends with a signed consultation record; indirect consultation produces an electronic result notice.
- Control the statutory period: the consultation and handling of its result must be completed within a maximum of 30 days from the date the goods are released or transferred into preservation.
- Implement the result: where the declarant accepts the proposed value or Customs rejects the declared value, a supplementary declaration is required within no more than five working days from issuance of the Customs Value Notice. Where there are insufficient grounds for rejection, clearance proceeds on the declared value.
COMMON RISKS AND ERRORS
| Error | Cause | Impact | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Submitting only invoice and contract | Treating consultation as a formality check | Pricing and payment logic remains unproven | Add negotiation, payment, accounting and technical evidence. |
| Treating reference data as a mandatory price | Confusing risk data with valuation method | Argument or self-adjustment follows the wrong basis | Compare transaction conditions and quantify differences. |
| Departments hold inconsistent records | Customs, purchasing and finance work separately | Contradictory amounts, dates or beneficiaries | Use one reconciliation controlled by a final reviewer. |
| Indirect payments omitted | Only supplier remittances are reviewed | Missing additions, potential tax recovery and penalties | Review set-offs, payments on behalf, third-party fees, royalties and assists. |
| Discount lacks pre-import evidence | Oral agreement or back-filled documentation | Discount may not be accepted | Retain policy, email, PO and qualifying conditions from the transaction date. |
| Representative does not understand the transaction | Formal authorization without internal preparation | Inconsistent answers and repeated requests | Prepare a Q&A, timeline and evidence owner for each issue. |
LEGAL BASIS AND OFFICIAL SOURCES
| Instrument/source | Issuer | Status/role | Key point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customs Law 54/2014/QH13 | National Assembly | Effective 1 January 2015 | Article 86 sets the customs-value principles. |
| Decree 08/2015/NĐ-CP, as amended by Decrees 59/2018 and 167/2025 | Government | Decree 167 effective 15 August 2025 | Framework for value review and handling of results. |
| Circular 38/2015/TT-BTC, amended by Circulars 39/2018 and 121/2025 | Ministry of Finance | Circular 121 effective 1 February 2026 | Clause 4 of Article 25 governs authority, forms, period, procedure, records and result handling, including electronic processing. |
| Circular 39/2015/TT-BTC, amended by Circular 60/2019 | Ministry of Finance | Specialized valuation framework | Valuation methods, transaction-value conditions and adjustments. |
| Vietnam Customs Portal | Customs authority | Operational guidance | Consultation timing and implementation guidance; not a substitute for legislation. |
FAQ
1. Is a price below Customs data automatically rejected?
No. The difference is a risk indicator, not the final legal basis. Product, trade level, quantity, timing and delivery conditions must be compared.
2. Must every original document be brought to the consultation?
There is no universal answer. Submission form depends on the document, Customs notice and the electronic process. Originals must be retained and produced when legally requested.
3. Does a related-party relationship automatically invalidate transaction value?
No. The key question is whether the relationship influenced price. Independent transaction data and pricing policy may be needed.
4. Can one consultation result be used for later shipments?
A one-time consultation result may be used repeatedly only when statutory conditions continue to be met. The declarant must be rated at high compliance or above; use is limited to one Regional Customs Sub-department; the result is valid for six months from the Customs Value Notice; declared transaction details must match, the new declared value must be equal to or higher than the notified value, and the legal basis must remain unchanged.
5. Can goods be released while consultation is pending?
Release depends on the shipment, tax security, guarantees and system decision. Consultation does not always require the goods to remain at port until completion.
6. What if the importer disagrees with the determined value?
The importer should obtain the written basis, review the file and use the applicable explanation, complaint or legal-remedy procedure within the statutory period.
Tiếng Việt
中文 (中国)
NEED TO REVIEW IMPORT PROCEDURES OR A SHIPPING PLAN?
Send us the product name, shipping route, current dossier, or implementation request in advance so we can suggest a suitable approach that is practical, focused, and aligned with your shipment.
Cargo Damage at a Port or Warehouse: An Immediate Response Checklist
What Is General Average? How Cargo Interests Should Respond to a GA Notice
When should businesses photograph or video container stuffing and opening?
When Can Cargo Insurers Reject or Reduce a Claim?
Risks of Failing to Inspect a Container Before Cargo Stuffing
Risks of Failing to Inspect a Container Before Cargo Stuffing
What Documents Are Required for a Cargo Insurance Claim?
What Information Should a Cargo Damage Survey Record Contain?
Total Loss vs Partial Loss in Cargo Insurance: What Is the Difference?
Cargo Dented, Wet or Missing Packages: What Should a Business Do?
Who Must Arrange Insurance under CIF and CIP?
Export Process: From Purchase Order to Final Document Set
How Is Cargo Insurance Value Determined?
How Do ICC-A, ICC-B and ICC-C Cargo Insurance Conditions Differ?
When Should a Business Buy Separate Cargo Insurance?