Responsibility for Retaining Test Reports and Conformity Records After Products Enter the Market
Customs clearance, warehouse receipt or market release does not end the obligation to prove conformity. During post-market quality control, specialised inspection, complaint handling or recall, the business must be able to retrieve the Test Report, conformity declaration dossier, surveillance records and evidence linking them to the correct product, model or shipment lot. In a post-clearance audit, these records are relevant where they relate to the customs file, specialised-control policy or the circulation conditions of the shipment.
QUICK FACTS
Circular 14/2026/TT-BKHCN requires the declarant to establish and retain conformity declaration records for inspection and audit.
The report is useful only when the tested sample can be traced to the model, configuration, manufacturer, factory and applicable technical regulation.
Retention depends on sector rules, the technical regulation, certificate validity, customs records and the product risk lifecycle.
Five years applies to customs records under Customs Law; it must not automatically be treated as the maximum period for quality records.
A change to the regulation, declaration, functions, intended use or product characteristics may require a new declaration.
SCOPE
This article applies to manufacturers, importers and entities named in conformity declarations for products subject to national or local technical regulations, especially medium- and high-risk goods or products under specialised management. It focuses on the period after customs clearance and market placement in Vietnam.
KEY TERMS
| Term | Meaning | Operational role |
|---|---|---|
| Test Report | A report issued by a testing body showing test results. | Evidence of sample performance against a standard or regulation; scope and sample identification must be verified. |
| Conformity declaration dossier | The records supporting registration that an object conforms to a technical regulation. | The declarant must retain and provide it when requested by competent authorities. |
| Conformity certification | Third-party assessment that the object conforms to a QCVN/QCDP. | Supports declaration where third-party assessment applies and normally includes surveillance. |
| Self-assessment | The business makes its own conformity conclusion based on technical records and valid test results. | The business bears direct responsibility for the assessment, control plan and periodic surveillance. |
| Post-market surveillance | Quality monitoring and inspection after products enter the market. | May cover labels, CR marks, conformity evidence, traceability and additional testing. |
| Change control | Formal control over product and technical-file changes. | Determines whether an existing Test Report remains representative or new testing/declaration is needed. |
HOW THE OBLIGATION WORKS
1. Quality responsibility continues after market placement
The amended product and goods quality framework adopts risk-based management and stronger post-market control. A business must continuously maintain conformity, quality control, testing and periodic surveillance while the product is marketed or used.
2. A Test Report is only one part of the evidence chain
A standalone PDF does not prove the full compliance case. Inspectors may verify sample origin, model equivalence, test methods, laboratory accreditation/designation scope and whether the marketed product changed after testing.
3. There is no universal period: build a record-specific retention schedule
Circular 14/2026/TT-BKHCN imposes a retention duty but does not set one universal number for every product. “Retain until the later supported endpoint” is a prudent control rule, not a single statutory period created by Circular 14. Businesses should map QCVN and sector rules, certificate validity, customs records, warranty, contracts and any open inspection, complaint or recall matter.
RETENTION RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX
| Record group | Primary owner | Retention approach | Control point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registration and database confirmation | Entity named in the declaration | Circular 14 sets no universal period; retain under QCVN/sector rules and while conformity must still be demonstrated. | Confirmation code, QCVN version, legal entity and declared object. |
| Certificate and certification file | Certificate/declaration holder | At least through certificate validity and the related post-market evidence period; do not destroy solely because it expired. | Product scope, factory, scheme and surveillance. |
| Test Report | Declaration holder or technical-file owner | Retain with the declaration/self-assessment file; close under the retention schedule and relevant sector/customs rules. | Report number, sample, model, serial/lot, date, method and laboratory scope. |
| Self-assessment and quality-control plan | Self-assessing business | Maintain during the declaration and retain under the schedule for inspection and audit. | Assessment report, test frequency, acceptance criteria and surveillance evidence. |
| Import and customs records | Customs declarant/cargo owner | Five years from customs declaration registration, unless another law requires otherwise. | Declaration, invoice, packing list, technical and specialised-control documents. |
| Change, nonconformity, recall and corrective-action records | Manufacturer/importer/declarant | Retain until the matter is closed and all legal, sector, contractual or dispute-related periods end. | Root cause, affected lots, notices, CAPA and recall evidence. |
RECORDS AND DATA TO VERIFY
| Document | Issued/prepared by | Fields that must align | Risk if missing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conformity registration | Declarant | Legal entity, product, model, QCVN/QCDP and assessment basis. | Declared scope cannot be demonstrated. |
| National database confirmation | Receiving authority/system | Confirmation number, date and dossier version. | Completion of registration is difficult to prove. |
| Conformity certificate | Certification body | Model, manufacturer, factory, regulation and validity. | Certificate may not cover marketed goods. |
| Test Report | Testing body | Sample, parameters, methods, results, units and authentication. | Insufficient or non-representative evidence. |
| Technical file | Manufacturer/business | Design, specifications, BOM, photos, label, packaging and instructions. | Actual goods cannot be matched to the tested sample. |
| Surveillance records | Business/certification body | Frequency, method, lots, results and actions. | Continuous conformity cannot be demonstrated. |
| Lot traceability | Warehouse, sales, ERP and logistics | Lot/serial, import date, channels, sold and remaining quantities. | Recall scope cannot be identified. |
| Change-control record | R&D, engineering, procurement and QA | Date, component/material, factory and impact assessment. | Old evidence is used for a changed product. |
RECORD-CONTROL PROCESS
Assign a unique file to each product/model/factory/QCVN combination; do not mix non-equivalent configurations.
Connect the Test Report, certificate, declaration, label, customs entry and lot numbers.
Review QCVN and sector rules, certificate terms, Customs Law, warranty and open dispute/recall records. Where several periods apply, use the later endpoint or obtain legal review and document the basis.
Keep records in the form required by law and by the dossier. Electronic retention must preserve legal validity, accessibility, integrity and provenance; an ordinary scan is generally only a copy.
Assess the impact of changes to QCVN, model, intended use, specifications, critical components, factory or process.
Collect complaints, periodic test results, market samples and nonconformity records.
Destroy only after all mandatory and approved internal periods end, no inspection, dispute, complaint or recall remains open, and Compliance/Legal approves.
COMMON RISKS AND ERRORS
| Error | Cause | Impact | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deleting files after clearance | Compliance is treated as an import-only step. | No evidence during post-market or post-clearance review. | Separate clearance date from retention end date. |
| Keeping only the Test Report | Files are managed in isolation. | The report cannot be linked to the marketed product. | Retain photos, model, serial/lot, BOM, label and sampling records. |
| Using one report for non-equivalent models | No product-family assessment. | Evidence may be rejected. | Maintain a model matrix and sample-representativeness rationale. |
| Laboratory outside the required scope | Only the laboratory name is checked. | Results may not be accepted for mandatory parameters. | Retain accreditation/designation scope valid at the test date. |
| No change control | Engineering or procurement changes are not escalated. | Marketed goods differ from the tested/declarated object. | Require Compliance approval in the change workflow. |
| Records stored in personal email | No central repository. | Data is lost when staff or accounts change. | Use DMS/ERP, role-based access and backups. |
| Applying five years mechanically | Customs retention is confused with all compliance retention. | Records may be destroyed too early. | Use a retention schedule; where several periods apply, use the later endpoint or obtain legal review and document the basis. |
LEGAL BASIS AND OFFICIAL SOURCES
| Instrument/source | Effective date/date | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Law 78/2025/QH15 | Effective 1 January 2026 | Introduces risk-based product quality management and stronger post-market control. |
| Decree 37/2026/ND-CP | Effective 23 January 2026 | Details implementation of the amended product and goods quality law. |
| Circular 14/2026/TT-BKHCN | Effective 25 May 2026 | Defines conformity dossiers, retention, surveillance, document provision and re-declaration triggers. |
| Consolidated Customs Law 54/VBHN-VPQH | Issued 23 March 2026 | Basis for five-year customs-record retention from declaration registration. |
| Law on Electronic Transactions 20/2023/QH15 | Effective 1 July 2024 | Basis for legal validity, original-form requirements and retention of records as data messages. |
| National Standards, Metrology and Quality Committee | Guidance dated 2 May 2026 | Official guidance on continuing conformity responsibility and dossier retention. |
FAQ
1. Can the Test Report be destroyed after all stock is sold?
Not based on inventory alone. Check the retention schedule against sector rules, customs records, warranty/use periods and any open inspection, complaint or recall. Where several periods apply, use the later endpoint or obtain legal review before destruction.
2. Must paper originals be retained?
Circular 14/2026/TT-BKHCN requires an “original” for certain dossier components. An electronic record can substitute only when it satisfies Vietnam’s e-transaction law and the applicable sector requirements; an ordinary scan is not automatically an original.
3. How long is a Test Report valid?
There is no universal period. Usability depends on the QCVN, sector rules, certification scheme, product changes and authority/certification-body requirements.
4. Is a foreign manufacturer report sufficient?
Only where the applicable framework accepts it and the testing body/result is accredited, designated or recognised as required, with a representative sample.
5. Does a minor component change require retesting?
An impact assessment is required. Changes affecting safety parameters, function, intended use or declared characteristics may trigger retesting, recertification or re-declaration.
6. When does the customs five-year period start?
From the customs declaration registration date. It is not automatically the maximum period for conformity records.
7. Who should own the dossier?
A clearly designated owner—typically QA/Compliance or product legal—should coordinate with customs, R&D, procurement, warehouse and sales.
Tiếng Việt
中文 (中国)
NEED TO REVIEW IMPORT PROCEDURES OR A SHIPPING PLAN?
Send us the product name, shipping route, current dossier, or implementation request in advance so we can suggest a suitable approach that is practical, focused, and aligned with your shipment.
Cargo Damage at a Port or Warehouse: An Immediate Response Checklist
What Is General Average? How Cargo Interests Should Respond to a GA Notice
When should businesses photograph or video container stuffing and opening?
When Can Cargo Insurers Reject or Reduce a Claim?
Risks of Failing to Inspect a Container Before Cargo Stuffing
Risks of Failing to Inspect a Container Before Cargo Stuffing
What Documents Are Required for a Cargo Insurance Claim?
What Information Should a Cargo Damage Survey Record Contain?
Total Loss vs Partial Loss in Cargo Insurance: What Is the Difference?
Cargo Dented, Wet or Missing Packages: What Should a Business Do?
Who Must Arrange Insurance under CIF and CIP?
Export Process: From Purchase Order to Final Document Set
How Is Cargo Insurance Value Determined?
How Do ICC-A, ICC-B and ICC-C Cargo Insurance Conditions Differ?
When Should a Business Buy Separate Cargo Insurance?